Sony FE 24-240mm f/3.5-6.3 OSS
Sony
66 Punteggio complessivo
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
Panasonic
88 Punteggio complessivo
Punteggi
Macro
Travel
Landscape
Budget
Wildlife Sports
Video Cinema
Professional
Portrait
Street
Specifiche
| Sony FE 24-240mm f/3.5-6.3 OSS | Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 24 mm | 28 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 240 mm | 200 mm |
| Elements | 17 | 17 |
| Groups | 12 | 13 |
| Aspherical Elements | 5★ | 1 |
| ED Elements | 1 | 4★ |
| Coating | T* | Fluorine coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | 22-40★ | f/4 |
| Min Aperture | 3.5-6.3 | 4-7.1 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7 | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | L-Mount |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.78 kg | 0.41 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 72 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Linear motor★ | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 6.5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 500 mm | 140 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 0.27x | 0.5x★ |
Pro e Contro
Sony FE 24-240mm f/3.5-6.3 OSS
- Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong versatility (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong optical (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Below average user sentiment (7th percentile)7th %ile
- Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average aperture (21st percentile)
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
- Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong bokeh (78th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)
Prezzi
Sony FE 24-240mm f/3.5-6.3 OSS0.079punteggio per dollaro
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm0.111punteggio per dollaro
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm offre un rapporto qualità-prezzo 1.4x migliore
Verdetto
Vincitore: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
Scores 88 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 22 specs.
