Anker A3025
Anker
36 Punteggio complessivo
vs
TOZO HT3
TOZO
85 Punteggio complessivo
Punteggi
Budget
Gaming
Work
Music
Commute
Studio
Calls
Specifiche
| Anker A3025 | TOZO HT3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | over-ear | over-ear |
| Open/Closed | closed | closed |
| Foldable | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.25 kg★ | 0.25 kg |
| Ear Cushion | Foam | Sponge |
| Headband | — | Silicone Protein Sponge |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | — | dynamic |
| Driver Size | — | 40 mm★ |
| Drivers | — | 2★ |
| Freq Min | — | 20 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | — | 20 kHz★ |
| Impedance | — | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 100 dB★ |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓ | ✓ |
| Codecs | — | TOZO HT3 Hybrid Noise Cancelling Headphones, 90H Playtime Wireless Over Ear Bluetooth Headset, Spatial Audio AI Chat with 5 Mics, Supports Dual Connection and USB-C Input, with 32 EQ Music Modes, Pink |
| Surround | — | Spatial Audio |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | hybrid | adaptive |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | — | 6.0 |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | — | 3.5mm |
| Range | — | 15 m★ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 60 hrs | 90 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 2 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 10 min for 9 hours playback |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | — | 4★ |
| NC Mic | — | ✓★ |
| Boom Mic | — | ✗ |
| Detachable Mic | — | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Other |
| Touch Controls | — | ✗ |
| App | — | TOZO |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✓★ |
| Water Resistance | — | IPX4 |
Pro e Contro
Anker A3025
- Strong battery (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong anc (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Below average comfort (35th percentile)
TOZO HT3
- Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong battery (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong build (96th percentile)96th %ile
Prezzi
Anker A30251.071punteggio per dollaro
vs
TOZO HT32.116punteggio per dollaro
TOZO HT3 offre un rapporto qualità-prezzo 2.0x migliore
Verdetto
Vincitore: TOZO HT3
Scores 85 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 13 of 37 specs.
