TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO
85 Punteggio complessivo
vs
JBL JBLT310CWHTAM

JBL JBLT310CWHTAM

JBL
32 Punteggio complessivo

Punteggi

Budget
TOZO
79
JBL
42
Gaming
TOZO
79
JBL
30
Travel
TOZO
78
JBL
18
Fitness
TOZO
72
JBL
16
Calls
TOZO
70
JBL
22
Commute
TOZO
70
JBL
18
Music
TOZO
68
JBL
35

Specifiche

TOZO Crystal PodsJBL JBLT310CWHTAM
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wirelesstrue wireless
Ear TipsMedium
Weight0.04 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size10 mm9 mm
Drivers2
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz
Impedance32 Ω16 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsLDACJBL Tune 310C - Wired Hi-Res in-Ear Headphones, Tangle-Free Flat Cable, 3-Button Remote with Microphone (White)
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typehybrid
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.4
Multipoint
Range10 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life7 hrs
Charge Time2 hrs
Fast Charging10-minute charge gives 2+ hours of play
ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery35 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count41
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantOther
Touch Controls
AppTOZO App
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIPX5

Pro e Contro

TOZO Crystal Pods

  • Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong anc (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong build (92nd percentile)92nd %ile

JBL JBLT310CWHTAM

  • Strong sound (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Below average battery (6th percentile)6th %ile
  • Below average comfort (28th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (32nd percentile)
  • Below average anc (32nd percentile)

Prezzi

Both products are similarly priced.

TOZO Crystal Pods5.245punteggio per dollaro
vs
JBL JBLT310CWHTAM1.768punteggio per dollaro

TOZO Crystal Pods offre un rapporto qualità-prezzo 3.0x migliore

Verdetto

Vincitore: TOZO Crystal Pods

Scores 85 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 17 of 36 specs.

TOZO Crystal Pods Migliore per:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

Da considerare anche