Technics EAH-AZ100-N
Technics
100 Punteggio complessivo
vs
Audio-Technica ATH-EQ300M PL
Audio-Technica
31 Punteggio complessivo
Punteggi
Calls
Travel
Budget
Music
Commute
Gaming
Fitness
Specifiche
| Technics EAH-AZ100-N | Audio-Technica ATH-EQ300M PL | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | ear-tip |
| Ear Tips | Extra large, Large, Medium, Small | — |
| Weight | 0.05 kg | 0.02 kg★ |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | — |
| Driver Size | 10 mm★ | — |
| Drivers | 1★ | — |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz★ | — |
| Freq Max | 40 kHz★ | — |
| Impedance | — | 20 Ω |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Codecs | AAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC | — |
| Surround | Dolby Atmos | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓★ | ✗ |
| ANC Type | adaptive | — |
| Transparency | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓★ | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.3★ | — |
| Profiles | AVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP | — |
| Multipoint | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Wired Connector | Bluetooth | — |
| Range | 10 m★ | — |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 8 hrs★ | — |
| Charge Time | 2.5 hrs★ | — |
| Fast Charging | 15 min. for 90 min. playback | — |
| Charging | USB-C★ | — |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 28 hrs★ | — |
| Case Charging | USB-C★ | — |
| Wireless Charging | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓★ | — |
| Mic Count | 6★ | — |
| NC Mic | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Google Assistant, Siri | — |
| Touch Controls | ✓★ | ✗ |
| App | Android & iOS | — |
| Volume Limiting | ✗ | — |
| Gaming Mode | ✗ | ✗ |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | IPX4 | — |
Pro e Contro
Technics EAH-AZ100-N
- Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile
Audio-Technica ATH-EQ300M PL
- Strong comfort (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Strong social proof (72nd percentile)
- Below average connectivity (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average mic (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average sound (30th percentile)
- Below average anc (32nd percentile)
Prezzi
Technics EAH-AZ100-N0.403punteggio per dollaro
vs
Audio-Technica ATH-EQ300M PL2.214punteggio per dollaro
Audio-Technica ATH-EQ300M PL offre un rapporto qualità-prezzo 5.5x migliore
Verdetto
Vincitore: Technics EAH-AZ100-N
Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 21 of 39 specs.
