JLab JBuds Pro

JLab JBuds Pro

JLab
47 Punteggio complessivo
vs
TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO
85 Punteggio complessivo

Punteggi

Budget
JLab
59
TOZO
79
Gaming
JLab
40
TOZO
79
Travel
JLab
32
TOZO
78
Fitness
JLab
34
TOZO
72
Calls
JLab
33
TOZO
70
Commute
JLab
31
TOZO
70
Music
JLab
42
TOZO
68

Specifiche

JLab JBuds ProTOZO Crystal Pods
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wireless
Ear TipsSmall, Medium, LargeMedium
Weight0.01 kg0.04 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size10 mm10 mm
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz
Impedance32 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsLDAC
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typehybrid
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.4
Multipoint
Range10 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life7 hrs
Charge Time2 hrs
Fast Charging10-minute charge gives 2+ hours of play
ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery35 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count4
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantOther
Touch Controls
AppTOZO App
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIPX5

Pro e Contro

JLab JBuds Pro

  • Strong comfort (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong social proof (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Strong sound (73rd percentile)
  • Below average connectivity (30th percentile)
  • Below average anc (32nd percentile)
  • Below average build (35th percentile)

TOZO Crystal Pods

  • Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong anc (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong build (92nd percentile)92nd %ile

Prezzi

Both products are similarly priced.

JLab JBuds Pro2.613punteggio per dollaro
vs
TOZO Crystal Pods5.245punteggio per dollaro

TOZO Crystal Pods offre un rapporto qualità-prezzo 2.0x migliore

Verdetto

Vincitore: TOZO Crystal Pods

Scores 85 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 16 of 35 specs.

TOZO Crystal Pods Migliore per:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

Da considerare anche