OKAMUS

OKAMUS

OKAMUS
50 Punteggio complessivo
vs
HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP
96 Punteggio complessivo

Punteggi

Gaming
OKAMUS
57
HP
91
Developer
OKAMUS
52
HP
87
Creator
OKAMUS
52
HP
87
Home Office
OKAMUS
54
HP
87
Business
OKAMUS
48
HP
87
Workstation
OKAMUS
54
HP
86
Ai Llm
OKAMUS
45
HP
67
Compact
OKAMUS
18
HP
32

Specifiche

OKAMUSHP OMEN GT16-0364
Processor
CPUCore i7AMD Ryzen 7 8700F
CPU Multi-Core ScoreDati non disponibili
31,207
Cores8
Frequency4.0 GHz4.1 GHz
L3 Cache16 MB
Graphics
GPU*Radeon RX 590NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070
GPU Benchmark Score
9,306
28,796
Typediscretediscrete
VRAM8 GB12 GB
VRAM TypeGDDR7
Memory & Storage
RAM512 GB32 GB
RAM GenerationDDR5DDR5
Storage 1512 GB1 TB
Storage 1 TypeNVMe SSDSSD
Build
Form FactorTowermid-tower
PSU550W850W
Weight8.00 kg14.50 kg
Connectivity
USB-C Ports2
USB Ports8
Thunderbolt0
HDMI1 x HDMI
DisplayPort3 x DisplayPort
Wi-FiWiFi 6Wi-Fi 6
BluetoothBluetooth 5.3Bluetooth 5.3
EthernetGigabit Ethernet
System
OSWindows 11 HomeWindows 11 Home

Pro e Contro

OKAMUS

  • Strong ram (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Below average reliability (11th percentile)11th %ile
  • Below average port (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (25th percentile)

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

  • Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong port (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong ram (88th percentile)88th %ile

Prezzi

OKAMUS is 1.310 USD cheaper (3.6x less).

OKAMUS0.099punteggio per dollaro
vs
HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 20250.053punteggio per dollaro

OKAMUS offre un rapporto qualità-prezzo 1.9x migliore

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

Verdetto

Vincitore: HP OMEN GT16-0364

Scores 96 overall, wins 8 of 8 usage categories and 12 of 26 specs.

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Migliore per:

Ai LlmGamingCompactCreatorBusinessDeveloperHome OfficeWorkstation

Da considerare anche