Intel Celeron G3900 2-core LGA1151
Intel
39 Punteggio complessivo
vs
G.Skill Trident Z Neo 6-core AMD Socket AM4
G.Skill
66 Punteggio complessivo
Punteggi
Efficiency
Productivity
Budget
Gaming
Ai Llm
Server
Specifiche
| Intel Celeron G3900 | G.Skill Trident Z Neo | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | Intel | AMD |
| Series | Celeron | Ryzen 5 |
| Model | G3900 | 3600 |
| Codename | Skylake | Matisse |
| Class | desktop | desktop |
| Process | 14 | 7★ |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | 2 | 6★ |
| P-cores | — | 6★ |
| Threads | 2 | 12★ |
| Base Clock | ||
| Boost Clock | Dati non disponibili | |
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | 2 | 3★ |
| L3 Cache | 2 | 32★ |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | ||
| PassMark Single | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Max Speed | ||
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Max Memory | 64★ | 32 |
| ECC | — | ✗ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | LGA1151 | AMD Socket AM4 |
| PCIe | — | 4.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16★ |
| TDP | 51★ | 65 |
| Unlocked | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 510 | — |
Pro e Contro
Intel Celeron G3900 2-core LGA1151
- Strong affordability (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong social proof (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong feature (70th percentile)
- Below average ai (23rd percentile)
- Below average multi thread (26th percentile)
- Below average efficiency (35th percentile)
G.Skill Trident Z Neo 6-core AMD Socket AM4
- Strong feature (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong efficiency (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong platform (79th percentile)
- Strong single thread (73rd percentile)
- Below average affordability (21st percentile)
Prezzi
Intel Celeron G3900 2-core LGA11510.812punteggio per dollaro
vs
G.Skill Trident Z Neo 6-core AMD Socket AM40.176punteggio per dollaro
Intel Celeron G3900 2-core LGA1151 offre un rapporto qualità-prezzo 4.6x migliore
Verdetto
Vincitore: G.Skill Trident Z Neo
Scores 66 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 13 of 26 specs.
