AMD EPYC 7343 16-core SP3

AMD EPYC 7343 16-core SP3

AMD
75 Punteggio complessivo
vs
CG CHIPS GATE CJ2M-CPU33--NEW--HW

CG CHIPS GATE CJ2M-CPU33--NEW--HW

CG CHIPS GATE
8 Punteggio complessivo

Punteggi

Productivity
AMD
86
CG CHIPS GATE
6
Server
AMD
82
CG CHIPS GATE
5
Ai Llm
AMD
77
CG CHIPS GATE
4
Gaming
AMD
45
CG CHIPS GATE
6
Budget
AMD
41
CG CHIPS GATE
13
Efficiency
AMD
39
CG CHIPS GATE
5

Specifiche

AMD EPYC 7343CG CHIPS GATE CJ2M-CPU33--NEW--HW
Processor
BrandAMD—
SeriesEPYC—
Model7343—
CodenameMilan—
Classserverdesktop
Process7★—
Cores & Clocks
Cores16★—
P-cores16★—
Threads32★—
Base Clock
3,200
Dati non disponibili
Boost Clock
3,900
Dati non disponibili
Cache
L2 Cache1★—
L3 Cache
128
Dati non disponibili
Performance
PassMark Multi
43,778
Dati non disponibili
PassMark Single
2,752
Dati non disponibili
Memory
Memory TypeDDR4★—
Max Speed
3,200
Dati non disponibili
ECC✓★—
Platform & Power
SocketSP3—
PCIe4.0—
PCIe Lanes
128
Dati non disponibili
TDP190★—
Max Turbo Power200★—
Unlocked✗—

Pro e Contro

AMD EPYC 7343 16-core SP3

  • Strong ai (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong multi thread (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong platform (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong efficiency (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average affordability (12th percentile)12th %ile
  • Below average social proof (15th percentile)15th %ile

CG CHIPS GATE CJ2M-CPU33--NEW--HW

  • Below average single thread (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average ai (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average multi thread (4th percentile)4th %ile
  • Below average efficiency (4th percentile)4th %ile

Prezzi

CG CHIPS GATE CJ2M-CPU33--NEW--HW is 282 USD cheaper (1.5x less).

AMD EPYC 7343 16-core SP30.094punteggio per dollaro
vs
CG CHIPS GATE CJ2M-CPU33--NEW--HW0.015punteggio per dollaro

AMD EPYC 7343 16-core SP3 offre un rapporto qualità-prezzo 6.3x migliore

AMD EPYC 7343 16-core SP3

CG CHIPS GATE CJ2M-CPU33--NEW--HW

Verdetto

★ Vincitore: AMD EPYC 7343

Scores 75 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 16 of 24 specs.

AMD EPYC 7343 Migliore per:

Ai LlmBudgetGamingServerEfficiencyProductivity

Da considerare anche