AMD FX 9590 8-core AM3+
AMD
48 Punteggio complessivo
vs
Thermal Grizzly Ryzen 7 000 AM5
Thermal Grizzly
13 Punteggio complessivo
Punteggi
Budget
Productivity
Gaming
Ai Llm
Server
Efficiency
Specifiche
| AMD FX 9590 | Thermal Grizzly Ryzen 7 000 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | AMD | AMD |
| Series | FX | — |
| Model | FX-9590 | 000 |
| Codename | Vishera | — |
| Class | desktop | desktop |
| Process | 32★ | — |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | 8★ | — |
| P-cores | 8★ | — |
| Threads | 8★ | — |
| Base Clock | Dati non disponibili | |
| Boost Clock | Dati non disponibili | |
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | 8★ | — |
| L3 Cache | 8★ | — |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | Dati non disponibili | |
| PassMark Single | Dati non disponibili | |
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | DDR3★ | — |
| Max Speed | Dati non disponibili | |
| ECC | ✓★ | — |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | AM3+ | AM5 |
| TDP | 220★ | — |
| Unlocked | ✓★ | — |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | — |
Pro e Contro
AMD FX 9590 8-core AM3+
- Strong feature (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong social proof (73rd percentile)
- Below average affordability (28th percentile)
- Below average efficiency (33rd percentile)
Thermal Grizzly Ryzen 7 000 AM5
- Strong affordability (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong social proof (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Below average single thread (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average ai (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average multi thread (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average efficiency (4th percentile)4th %ile
Prezzi
AMD FX 9590 8-core AM3+0.216punteggio per dollaro
vs
Thermal Grizzly Ryzen 7 000 AM50.559punteggio per dollaro
Thermal Grizzly Ryzen 7 000 AM5 offre un rapporto qualità-prezzo 2.6x migliore
Verdetto
Vincitore: AMD FX 9590
Scores 48 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 15 of 22 specs.
