iBeam TE-FTGC
iBeam
18 Punteggio complessivo
vs
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II Black 2015
Olympus
58 Punteggio complessivo
Punteggi
Sports Wildlife
Vlogging
Beginner
Travel
Streaming
Video
Wedding Events
Youtube
Photography
Product Photography
Specifiche
| iBeam TE-FTGC | Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | CMOS | Live MOS |
| Size | — | micro-four-thirds |
| Megapixels | — | 16.100000381469727 MP★ |
| ISO Range | — | 100★ |
| Processor | — | TruePic VII |
| Autofocus | ||
| AF Points | — | 81★ |
| AF Type | — | 81 |
| Shooting | ||
| Burst (Mechanical) | — | 10 fps★ |
| Max Shutter | — | 1/8000 |
| Electronic Shutter | — | ✓★ |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | — | 1080p★ |
| 1080p FPS | — | 60 fps★ |
| RAW Video | — | ✓★ |
| Codec | — | various codecs |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | — | 3"★ |
| Articulating | — | ✓★ |
| EVF Resolution | — | 2.4M dots★ |
| Build | ||
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | — | 0.41 kg★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | ✓★ |
| Hot Shoe | — | ✓★ |
Pro e Contro
iBeam TE-FTGC
- Below average connectivity (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average video (23rd percentile)
- Below average display (28th percentile)
- Below average sensor (29th percentile)
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II Black 2015
- Strong build (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong stabilization (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong evf (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong social proof (79th percentile)
- Below average sensor (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
Prezzi
iBeam TE-FTGC0.143punteggio per dollaro
vs
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II Black 20150.039punteggio per dollaro
iBeam TE-FTGC offre un rapporto qualità-prezzo 3.7x migliore
Verdetto
Vincitore: Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II
Scores 58 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 15 of 21 specs.
