OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED30mm F3.5 Macro
OM System
26 Punteggio complessivo
vs
CHEOTIME Mirrorless 2025
CHEOTIME
39 Punteggio complessivo
Punteggi
Video
Beginner
Photography
Sports Wildlife
Product Photography
Wedding Events
Travel
Streaming
Youtube
Vlogging
Specifiche
| OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED30mm F3.5 Macro | CHEOTIME Mirrorless | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Megapixels | — | 48 MP★ |
| Shooting | ||
| Burst (Mechanical) | — | 30 fps★ |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | — | 4K★ |
| 4K FPS | — | 30 fps★ |
| Log Profile | — | ✓★ |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | — | 3"★ |
| Build | ||
| Weight | 0.14 kg★ | 0.36 kg |
| Connectivity | ||
| Hot Shoe | — | ✓★ |
Pro e Contro
OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED30mm F3.5 Macro
- Strong user sentiment (83th percentile)83th %ile
- Strong social proof (83th percentile)83th %ile
- Below average build (3th percentile)3th %ile
- Below average connectivity (17th percentile)17th %ile
- Below average video (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average display (25th percentile)
CHEOTIME Mirrorless 2025
- Strong burst (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong sensor (66th percentile)
- Strong video (66th percentile)
- Below average display (25th percentile)
- Below average stabilization (32th percentile)
- Below average af (33th percentile)
Prezzi
OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED30mm F3.5 Macro0.087punteggio per dollaro
vs
CHEOTIME Mirrorless 20250.569punteggio per dollaro
CHEOTIME Mirrorless 2025 offre un rapporto qualità-prezzo 6.5x migliore
Verdetto
Vincitore: CHEOTIME Mirrorless
Scores 39 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 7 of 8 specs.
