Crucial E100
Crucial
60 Score global
vs
Kingston SSD
Kingston
95 Score global
Scores
Workstation
Budget
Gaming
Console
Laptop
Portable
Spécifications
| Crucial E100 | Kingston SSD | |
|---|---|---|
| Drive | ||
| Capacity | ||
| Form Factor | M.2 2280 | M.2 |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Protocol | NVMe | NVMe |
| PCIe Generation | 4 | 4 |
| External | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | ||
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | ||
| Random Read (IOPS) | Pas de données | |
| Random Write (IOPS) | Pas de données | |
| Hardware | ||
| NAND | — | TLC★ |
| DRAM Cache | — | ✓★ |
| Reliability | ||
| Endurance (TBW) | ||
| MTBF (hours) | Pas de données | |
| Warranty (years) | 3 | 5★ |
| Features | ||
| Heatsink | ✗ | ✓★ |
Avantages & Inconvénients
Crucial E100
- Strong speed (73rd percentile)
- Strong social proof (70th percentile)
- Below average feature (14th percentile)14th %ile
Kingston SSD
- Strong social proof (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong feature (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong random (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong endurance (94th percentile)94th %ile
Prix
Crucial E1000.378score par dollar
vs
Kingston SSD0.191score par dollar
Crucial E100 offre un rapport qualité-prix 2.0x meilleur
Verdict
Gagnant: Kingston SSD
Scores 95 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 11 of 16 specs.
