Inland TN320 256GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
Inland
51 Score global
vs
Kingston SSD PCIe 5.0 NVMe M.2 2280
Kingston
98 Score global
Scores
Laptop
Workstation
Gaming
Console
Budget
Portable
Spécifications
| Inland TN320 | Kingston SSD | |
|---|---|---|
| Drive | ||
| Capacity | ||
| Form Factor | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x4 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Protocol | NVMe | NVMe |
| PCIe Generation | 3 | 5★ |
| External | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | ||
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | ||
| Random Read (IOPS) | Pas de données | |
| Random Write (IOPS) | Pas de données | |
| Hardware | ||
| NAND | TLC | TLC |
| DRAM Cache | — | ✓★ |
| Controller | — | SM2508 |
| Reliability | ||
| Endurance (TBW) | ||
| MTBF (hours) | Pas de données | |
| Warranty (years) | 6★ | 5 |
| Features | ||
| Heatsink | — | ✗ |
Avantages & Inconvénients
Inland TN320 256GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong endurance (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong affordability (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Below average capacity (18th percentile)18th %ile
Kingston SSD PCIe 5.0 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong speed (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong endurance (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong capacity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Below average affordability (6th percentile)6th %ile
Prix
Inland TN320 256GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 22800.852score par dollar
vs
Kingston SSD PCIe 5.0 NVMe M.2 22800.086score par dollar
Inland TN320 256GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280 offre un rapport qualité-prix 9.9x meilleur
Verdict
Gagnant: Kingston SSD
Scores 98 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 8 of 17 specs.
