Netac
Netac
58 Score global
vs
Kingstone (KVR16N11/8)
Kingstone
29 Score global
Scores
Budget
Workstation
Gaming
Laptop
Server
Spécifications
| Netac | Kingstone | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR4★ | DDR3 |
| Form Factor | UDIMM | UDIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 2★ | 1 |
| Per Module | ||
| Pins | 288 | 240 |
| Rank | — | 1Rx8 |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 16 | 11★ |
| Timings | — | 11-11-11 |
| Voltage | 1.350000023841858★ | 1.5 |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✗ |
| Registered | ✗ | ✗ |
| OC Profile | Intel XMP 2.0 | — |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✗ | ✗ |
| Heat Spreader | ✓★ | ✗ |
Avantages & Inconvénients
Netac
- Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong affordability (79th percentile)
- Strong feature (75th percentile)
- Strong capacity (71st percentile)
- Below average social proof (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
Kingstone (KVR16N11/8)
- Strong affordability (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Below average speed (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average feature (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average capacity (23rd percentile)
Prix
Netac0.811score par dollar
vs
Kingstone (KVR16N11/8)1.047score par dollar
Kingstone (KVR16N11/8) offre un rapport qualité-prix 1.3x meilleur
Verdict
Gagnant: Netac
Scores 58 overall, wins 5 of 5 usage categories and 7 of 16 specs.
