ASUS Eye Care VZ24EHF 24" Black
ASUS
45 Score global
vs
MSI MAG MAG 321CUP QD-OLED 32" Black 2025
MSI
94 Score global
Scores
Gaming
Office
Entertainment
Professional
Creative
Portable
Spécifications
| ASUS Eye Care VZ24EHF 24" | MSI MAG MAG 321CUP QD-OLED 32" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 24" | 32" |
| Resolution | 1920 x 1080 | 3840 x 2160 |
| Panel Type | IPS | OLED★ |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✓ |
| Curvature | — | 1,700 |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 100 Hz | 165 Hz★ |
| Response Time | 1 ms | 0.029999999329447746 ms★ |
| Adaptive Sync | Adaptive-Sync | G-Sync Compatible★ |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 250 nits | 1000 nits★ |
| Color Gamut | 72% NTSC | 99% DCI-P3, 98% Adobe RGB & 138% sRGB |
| Color Depth | 16.7 Million | 10-bit★ |
| HDR | — | DisplayHDR True Black 400 |
| HDR Support | — | HDR400 |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 1 | 2★ |
| DisplayPort | — | 1★ |
| USB-C | — | 1★ |
| Speakers | — | ✗ |
| Headphone Jack | ✓ | ✓ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Pivot | ✗ | ✓★ |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | — | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | — | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | — | ✗ |
| Power | 19W★ | — |
| Weight | 2.85 kg★ | 9.10 kg |
Avantages & Inconvénients
ASUS Eye Care VZ24EHF 24" Black
- Strong portability (74th percentile)
- Strong performance (68th percentile)
- Strong social proof (66th percentile)
- Below average color (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average feature (23rd percentile)
- Below average connectivity (28th percentile)
MSI MAG MAG 321CUP QD-OLED 32" Black 2025
- Strong color (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong display (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong performance (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong feature (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
Prix
ASUS Eye Care VZ24EHF 24" Black0.392score par dollar
vs
MSI MAG MAG 321CUP QD-OLED 32" Black 20250.125score par dollar
ASUS Eye Care VZ24EHF 24" Black offre un rapport qualité-prix 3.1x meilleur
Verdict
Gagnant: MSI MAG MAG 321CUP QD-OLED 32"
Scores 94 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 12 of 29 specs.
