Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2 32" Black 2024

Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2 32" Black 2024

Gigabyte
87 Score global
vs
ASUS MG278Q

ASUS MG278Q

ASUS
54 Score global

Scores

Gaming
Gigabyte
87
ASUS
51
Office
Gigabyte
85
ASUS
60
Professional
Gigabyte
83
ASUS
44
Creative
Gigabyte
81
ASUS
38
Entertainment
Gigabyte
80
ASUS
42
Portable
Gigabyte
15
ASUS
5

Spécifications

Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2 32"ASUS MG278Q
Display
Size32"27"
Resolution3840 x 21602560 x 1440
Panel TypeOLED
Aspect Ratio16:916:9
Curved
Performance
Refresh Rate240 Hz144 Hz
Response Time0.029999999329447746 ms1 ms
Adaptive SyncFreeSync Premium ProG-Sync Compatible
Color & HDR
Brightness250 nits
Color Gamut99% DCI-P3
Color Depth10bit
HDRDisplayHDR True Black 400
HDR SupportHDR
Connectivity
HDMI Ports22
DisplayPort11
USB-C1
Speakers
Headphone Jack
Ergonomics
Height Adjustable
Tilt
Swivel
Pivot
VESA Mount100x100100x100
Features
Webcam
Touchscreen
PIP/PBP
Weight8.53 kg7.67 kg

Avantages & Inconvénients

Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2 32" Black 2024

  • Strong display (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong ergonomic (91st percentile)91st %ile

ASUS MG278Q

  • Strong ergonomic (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (75th percentile)
  • Strong performance (74th percentile)
  • Below average portability (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average color (19th percentile)19th %ile
  • Below average feature (23rd percentile)

Prix

ASUS MG278Q is 427 $US cheaper (2.1x less).

Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2 32" Black 20240.108score par dollar
vs
ASUS MG278Q0.140score par dollar

ASUS MG278Q offre un rapport qualité-prix 1.3x meilleur

Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2 32" Black 2024

ASUS MG278Q

Verdict

Gagnant: Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2 32"

Scores 87 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 8 of 27 specs.

Gigabyte AORUS FO32U2 32" Meilleur pour:

GamingOfficeCreativePortableProfessionalEntertainment

A considérer aussi