AOC Gaming C27G4ZH 27"
AOC
64 Score global
vs
MSI MAG 272QP QD-OLED X24 27" Black 2026
MSI
85 Score global
Scores
Office
Gaming
Professional
Creative
Entertainment
Portable
Spécifications
| AOC Gaming C27G4ZH 27" | MSI MAG 272QP QD-OLED X24 27" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 27" | 27" |
| Resolution | 1920 x 1080 | 2560 x 1440 |
| Panel Type | VA | OLED★ |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✓ | ✗ |
| Curvature | 1,500 | — |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 280 Hz★ | 240 Hz |
| Response Time | 0.30000001192092896 ms | 0.029999999329447746 ms★ |
| Adaptive Sync | FreeSync Premium | G-Sync Compatible★ |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | — | 200 nits★ |
| Color Gamut | — | 99% DCI-P3, 98% Adobe RGB, 138% sRGB |
| Color Depth | — | 10-bit★ |
| HDR | HDR Ready | HDR Ready |
| HDR Support | HDR | HDR |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | — | 2★ |
| DisplayPort | — | 1★ |
| USB-C | — | 1★ |
| Speakers | — | ✗ |
| Headphone Jack | — | ✓★ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pivot | — | ✓★ |
| VESA Mount | — | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | — | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | — | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | — | ✓★ |
| Power | — | 95W★ |
| Weight | 5.44 kg★ | 5.67 kg |
Avantages & Inconvénients
AOC Gaming C27G4ZH 27"
- Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong performance (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong feature (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Below average connectivity (11th percentile)11th %ile
- Below average portability (15th percentile)15th %ile
MSI MAG 272QP QD-OLED X24 27" Black 2026
- Strong social proof (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong ergonomic (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong feature (86th percentile)86th %ile
Prix
AOC Gaming C27G4ZH 27"0.378score par dollar
vs
MSI MAG 272QP QD-OLED X24 27" Black 20260.213score par dollar
AOC Gaming C27G4ZH 27" offre un rapport qualité-prix 1.8x meilleur
Verdict
Gagnant: MSI MAG 272QP QD-OLED X24 27"
Scores 85 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 12 of 29 specs.
