Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
Tamron
100 Score global
vs
Fujifilm XF16-55mmF2.8 R LM WR II 16-55mm
Fujifilm
71 Score global
Scores
Video Cinema
Professional
Budget
Travel
Macro
Portrait
Landscape
Street
Wildlife Sports
Spécifications
| Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD | Fujifilm XF16-55mmF2.8 R LM WR II 16-55mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 17 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 70 mm | 55 mm |
| Elements | 16 | 16 |
| Groups | 12 | 11 |
| Aspherical Elements | 3 | 4★ |
| ED Elements | 2★ | 1 |
| Coating | Fluorine Coating | Fluorine coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/22 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 11★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Fujifilm X | Fujifilm X |
| Format | APS-C | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.54 kg | 0.41 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | 72 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | RXD | Linear motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 190 mm★ | 300 mm |
| Max Magnification | 1:4.8★ | 0.2x |
Avantages & Inconvénients
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
- Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong versatility (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong macro (86th percentile)86th %ile
Fujifilm XF16-55mmF2.8 R LM WR II 16-55mm
- Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong social proof (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong versatility (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Below average aperture (21st percentile)
- Below average bokeh (35th percentile)
Prix
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD0.170score par dollar
vs
Fujifilm XF16-55mmF2.8 R LM WR II 16-55mm0.059score par dollar
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD offre un rapport qualité-prix 2.9x meilleur
Verdict
Gagnant: Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
Scores 100 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 21 specs.
