Meike 50mm f/0.95 50mm
Meike
46 Score global
vs
Yongnuo YN12-35mm F2.8-4M 12-35mm
Yongnuo
81 Score global
Scores
Professional
Wildlife Sports
Portrait
Street
Landscape
Video Cinema
Travel
Budget
Macro
Spécifications
| Meike 50mm f/0.95 50mm | Yongnuo YN12-35mm F2.8-4M 12-35mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 50 mm | 12 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 50 mm | 35 mm |
| Elements | 7 | 14 |
| Groups | 5 | 11 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 4★ |
| ED Elements | — | 3★ |
| Coating | — | Nano Surface Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/0.95 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/16 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | — | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 13★ | 7 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon EF-M | Micro Four Thirds |
| Format | APS-C★ | micro-four-thirds |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.42 kg | 0.32 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 62 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | STM stepping motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 450 mm | 250 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.5x★ |
Avantages & Inconvénients
Meike 50mm f/0.95 50mm
- Strong bokeh (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Below average optical (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average social proof (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Yongnuo YN12-35mm F2.8-4M 12-35mm
- Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong build (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Below average social proof (35th percentile)
Prix
Meike 50mm f/0.95 50mm0.182score par dollar
vs
Yongnuo YN12-35mm F2.8-4M 12-35mm0.225score par dollar
Yongnuo YN12-35mm F2.8-4M 12-35mm offre un rapport qualité-prix 1.2x meilleur
Verdict
Gagnant: Yongnuo YN12-35mm F2.8-4M 12-35mm
Scores 81 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.
