Tamron A17-200 28-200mm
Tamron
45 Score global
vs
Nikon Nikkor 2166 55-200mm
Nikon
85 Score global
Scores
Budget
Macro
Portrait
Street
Travel
Landscape
Video Cinema
Professional
Wildlife Sports
Spécifications
| Tamron A17-200 28-200mm | Nikon Nikkor 2166 55-200mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | telephoto |
| Focal Length Min | 28 mm | 55 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 200 mm | 200 mm |
| Elements | — | 13 |
| Groups | — | 9 |
| ED Elements | — | 2★ |
| Coating | — | Super Integrated Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.8 | f/4 |
| Min Aperture | 3.8-5.6 | 4-5.6 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 7★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Adaptall | Nikon F |
| Format | full-frame★ | APS-C |
| Weight | 0.08 kg★ | 0.34 kg |
| Filter Thread | 72 mm | 52 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | manual focus only | Silent Wave Motor |
| Stabilization | — | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 4 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 200 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:3.5★ |
Avantages & Inconvénients
Tamron A17-200 28-200mm
- Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong aperture (76th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (74th percentile)
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
Nikon Nikkor 2166 55-200mm
- Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong versatility (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong macro (84th percentile)84th %ile
Prix
Tamron A17-200 28-200mm0.138score par dollar
vs
Nikon Nikkor 2166 55-200mm0.711score par dollar
Nikon Nikkor 2166 55-200mm offre un rapport qualité-prix 5.2x meilleur
Verdict
Gagnant: Nikon Nikkor 2166 55-200mm
Scores 85 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 20 specs.
