Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
44 Score global
vs
Panasonic Lumix S 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 Macro
Panasonic
42 Score global
Scores
Portrait
Budget
Macro
Video Cinema
Street
Professional
Travel
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Spécifications
| Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | Panasonic Lumix S 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 Macro | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | macro |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 70 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 300 mm |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/4.5 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | — | L-Mount |
| Weight | — | 2.03 kg★ |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| Stabilization | — | ✓★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 300 mm★ |
Avantages & Inconvénients
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Panasonic Lumix S 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 Macro
- Strong versatility (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong macro (71st percentile)
- Below average build (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (25th percentile)
Prix
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS0.064score par dollar
vs
Panasonic Lumix S 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 Macro0.035score par dollar
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS offre un rapport qualité-prix 1.8x meilleur
Verdict
Gagnant: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Scores 44 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 0 of 9 specs.
