Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Nikon
91 Score global
vs
Laowa 200mm f/2 AF FF 200mm
Laowa
30 Score global
Scores
Professional
Macro
Budget
Street
Portrait
Video Cinema
Landscape
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Spécifications
| Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 | Laowa 200mm f/2 AF FF 200mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 17 mm | 200 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 28 mm | 200 mm |
| Elements | 13 | 11 |
| Groups | 11 | 9 |
| Aspherical Elements | 3★ | — |
| ED Elements | 3★ | — |
| Coating | Multi-Coated | 1034 |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/22 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon Z | Canon EF |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.45 kg★ | 1.56 kg |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | 105 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Stepping Motor★ | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 190 mm★ | 1.50 m |
| Max Magnification | 1:5.26★ | 0.15x |
Avantages & Inconvénients
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
Laowa 200mm f/2 AF FF 200mm
- Below average build (17th percentile)17th %ile
- Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average bokeh (23rd percentile)
- Below average macro (29th percentile)
Prix
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.086score par dollar
vs
Laowa 200mm f/2 AF FF 200mm0.017score par dollar
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 offre un rapport qualité-prix 5.1x meilleur
Verdict
Gagnant: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.
