Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Score global
vs
Thypoch Simera-C 35mm T1.5 Cine 35mm

Thypoch Simera-C 35mm T1.5 Cine 35mm

Thypoch
25 Score global

Scores

Professional
Nikon
89
Thypoch
35
Macro
Nikon
88
Thypoch
22
Budget
Nikon
85
Thypoch
25
Street
Nikon
84
Thypoch
34
Portrait
Nikon
84
Thypoch
39
Video Cinema
Nikon
82
Thypoch
40
Landscape
Nikon
79
Thypoch
22
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
73
Thypoch
28
Travel
Nikon
70
Thypoch
16

Spécifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Thypoch Simera-C 35mm T1.5 Cine 35mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min17 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm35 mm
Elements13—
Groups11—
Aspherical Elements3★1
ED Elements3★1
CoatingMulti-CoatedMultilayer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/16
Min Aperturef/2.8f/1.5
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades916★
Build
MountNikon ZLeica M
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.45 kg★—
Filter Thread67 mm—
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motor★—
Stabilization✗—
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm★—
Max Magnification1:5.26★—

Avantages & Inconvénients

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Thypoch Simera-C 35mm T1.5 Cine 35mm

  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average build (32nd percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Prix

Both products are similarly priced.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.086score par dollar
vs
Thypoch Simera-C 35mm T1.5 Cine 35mm0.026score par dollar

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 offre un rapport qualité-prix 3.3x meilleur

Verdict

★ Gagnant: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Meilleur pour:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

A considérer aussi