Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Nikon
95 Score global
vs
Trioplan 35mm f/2.8 II 35mm
Meyer-Optik Görlitz
67 Score global
Scores
Professional
Portrait
Street
Budget
Macro
Landscape
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Spécifications
| Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 | Trioplan 35mm f/2.8 II 35mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | — |
| Focal Length Min | 17 mm | 35 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 28 mm | 35 mm |
| Elements | 13 | — |
| Groups | 11 | — |
| Aspherical Elements | 3★ | — |
| ED Elements | 3★ | — |
| Coating | Multi-Coated | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | f/22 |
| Constant | ✓★ | — |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 12★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon Z | Micro Four Thirds |
| Format | full-frame★ | Micro Four Thirds |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.45 kg | 0.30 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | 52 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Stepping Motor★ | — |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 190 mm★ | 200 mm |
| Max Magnification | 1:5.26★ | — |
Avantages & Inconvénients
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
Trioplan 35mm f/2.8 II 35mm
- Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong bokeh (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Prix
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.090score par dollar
vs
Trioplan 35mm f/2.8 II 35mm0.104score par dollar
Trioplan 35mm f/2.8 II 35mm offre un rapport qualité-prix 1.2x meilleur
Verdict
Gagnant: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.
