Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Score global
vs
KIPON Colibri Colobri 90mm T2.5 Full-Frame Cine 90mm

KIPON Colibri Colobri 90mm T2.5 Full-Frame Cine 90mm

KIPON
33 Score global

Scores

Professional
Nikon
95
KIPON
32
Portrait
Nikon
89
KIPON
35
Street
Nikon
86
KIPON
31
Budget
Nikon
86
KIPON
31
Macro
Nikon
85
KIPON
31
Landscape
Nikon
83
KIPON
19
Video Cinema
Nikon
83
KIPON
37
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
78
KIPON
28
Travel
Nikon
75
KIPON
20

Spécifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8KIPON Colibri Colobri 90mm T2.5 Full-Frame Cine 90mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min17 mm90 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm90 mm
Elements13
Groups11
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements3
CoatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8T16
Min Aperturef/2.8T2.5
Constant
Diaphragm Blades910
Build
MountNikon ZSony E
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.55 kg
Filter Thread67 mm77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm700 mm
Max Magnification1:5.26

Avantages & Inconvénients

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

KIPON Colibri Colobri 90mm T2.5 Full-Frame Cine 90mm

  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Prix

Both products are similarly priced.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.090score par dollar
vs
KIPON Colibri Colobri 90mm T2.5 Full-Frame Cine 90mm0.030score par dollar

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 offre un rapport qualité-prix 3.0x meilleur

KIPON Colibri Colobri 90mm T2.5 Full-Frame Cine 90mm

Verdict

Gagnant: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Meilleur pour:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

A considérer aussi