Canon RF 75-300mm F4-5.6

Canon RF 75-300mm F4-5.6

Canon
47 Score global
vs
Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC

Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC

Sigma
91 Score global

Scores

Professional
Canon
47
Sigma
95
Portrait
Canon
53
Sigma
94
Budget
Canon
57
Sigma
90
Video Cinema
Canon
51
Sigma
83
Macro
Canon
29
Sigma
82
Travel
Canon
40
Sigma
81
Street
Canon
50
Sigma
81
Landscape
Canon
38
Sigma
80
Wildlife Sports
Canon
47
Sigma
72

Spécifications

Canon RF 75-300mm F4-5.6Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC
Optics
Typetelephoto-zoomzoom
Focal Length Min75 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max300 mm40 mm
Elements17
Groups11
Aspherical Elements4
ED Elements4
CoatingSuper Spectra CoatingSuper Multi-Layer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/5.6f/1.8
Min Aperturef/4f/1.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades711
Build
MountCanon RFFujifilm X
Formatfull-frameAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.93 kg0.54 kg
Filter Thread58 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeUSMHLA (High-response Linear Actuator)
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance1.49 m280 mm
Max Magnification0.25x1:4.8

Avantages & Inconvénients

Canon RF 75-300mm F4-5.6

  • Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong versatility (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Below average social proof (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average build (22nd percentile)
  • Below average macro (29th percentile)

Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC

  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong aperture (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong social proof (83rd percentile)83rd %ile

Prix

Canon RF 75-300mm F4-5.6 is 722 $US cheaper (5.0x less).

Canon RF 75-300mm F4-5.60.260score par dollar
vs
Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC0.100score par dollar

Canon RF 75-300mm F4-5.6 offre un rapport qualité-prix 2.6x meilleur

Verdict

Gagnant: Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC Meilleur pour:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

A considérer aussi