KIPON Colibri 35mm T2.5 35mm
KIPON
31 Score global
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
Panasonic
88 Score global
Scores
Macro
Travel
Landscape
Budget
Video Cinema
Professional
Portrait
Street
Wildlife Sports
Spécifications
| KIPON Colibri 35mm T2.5 35mm | Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 35 mm | 28 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 35 mm | 200 mm |
| Elements | — | 17 |
| Groups | — | 13 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 1★ |
| ED Elements | — | 4★ |
| Coating | — | Fluorine coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | T16 | f/4 |
| Min Aperture | T2.5 | 4-7.1 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 10★ | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon RF | L-Mount |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.40 kg★ | 0.41 kg |
| Filter Thread | 77 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | manual focus only | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 6.5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 330 mm | 140 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.5x★ |
Avantages & Inconvénients
KIPON Colibri 35mm T2.5 35mm
- Strong macro (68th percentile)
- Strong build (65th percentile)
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
- Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong bokeh (79th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)
Prix
KIPON Colibri 35mm T2.5 35mm0.027score par dollar
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm0.111score par dollar
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm offre un rapport qualité-prix 4.1x meilleur
Verdict
Gagnant: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
Scores 88 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.
