Insta360 X4 Air CINSBAFL 35mm
Insta360
35 Score global
vs
Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM 85mm
Canon
48 Score global
Scores
Portrait
Budget
Wildlife Sports
Street
Video Cinema
Macro
Professional
Travel
Landscape
Spécifications
| Insta360 X4 Air CINSBAFL 35mm | Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM 85mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | fisheye | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 35 mm | 85 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 35 mm | 85 mm |
| Elements | — | 9 |
| Groups | — | 7 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 1★ |
| Coating | — | ultra multi-coating (UMC) |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/1.94 | f/22 |
| Min Aperture | f/1.94 | f/1.8 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 8★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Insta360 X4 Air | Canon EF |
| Format | — | Full-Frame★ |
| Weight | — | 0.42 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 58 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | USM★ |
| Stabilization | — | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 853 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:7.7★ |
Avantages & Inconvénients
Insta360 X4 Air CINSBAFL 35mm
- Strong aperture (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong bokeh (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Below average social proof (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average macro (12th percentile)12th %ile
- Below average optical (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average build (31st percentile)
Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM 85mm
- Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong social proof (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Below average bokeh (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average aperture (23rd percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Prix
Insta360 X4 Air CINSBAFL 35mm1.385score par dollar
vs
Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM 85mm0.075score par dollar
Insta360 X4 Air CINSBAFL 35mm offre un rapport qualité-prix 18.5x meilleur
Verdict
Gagnant: Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM 85mm
Scores 48 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 19 specs.
