Canon EF-S17-55IS

Canon EF-S17-55IS

Canon
69 Score global
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Panasonic
89 Score global

Scores

Macro
Canon
76
Panasonic
100
Budget
Canon
65
Panasonic
91
Landscape
Canon
51
Panasonic
90
Travel
Canon
42
Panasonic
90
Video Cinema
Canon
64
Panasonic
86
Street
Canon
64
Panasonic
80
Professional
Canon
58
Panasonic
80
Wildlife Sports
Canon
52
Panasonic
77
Portrait
Canon
74
Panasonic
76

Spécifications

Canon EF-S17-55ISPanasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min17 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max55 mm200 mm
Elements1917
Groups1213
Aspherical Elements—1★
ED Elements—4★
Coating—Fluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/4
Min Aperturef/2.84-7.1
Constant✓★✗
Diaphragm Blades79★
Build
MountCanon EF-SL-Mount
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed—✓★
Weight0.65 kg0.41 kg★
Filter Thread77 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeUSM★Autofocus
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops3 stops6.5 stops★
Focus
Min Focus Distance350 mm140 mm★
Max Magnification0.17x0.5x★

Avantages & Inconvénients

Canon EF-S17-55IS

  • Strong aperture (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

  • Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong build (78th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (23rd percentile)

Prix

Both products are similarly priced.

Canon EF-S17-55IS0.078score par dollar
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm0.111score par dollar

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm offre un rapport qualité-prix 1.4x meilleur

Verdict

★ Gagnant: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm

Scores 89 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 22 specs.

Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm Meilleur pour:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

A considérer aussi