Vivitar V420-800-EOS-R 420-1600mm
Vivitar
45 Score global
vs
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 16-50mm
Sony
90 Score global
Scores
Travel
Street
Budget
Wildlife Sports
Video Cinema
Portrait
Landscape
Professional
Macro
Spécifications
| Vivitar V420-800-EOS-R 420-1600mm | Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 16-50mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | telephoto | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 420 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 800 mm | 50 mm |
| Elements | — | 9 |
| Groups | — | 8 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 4★ |
| ED Elements | 1 | 1 |
| Coating | multi-coated | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/16 | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | f/8.3 | 3.5-5.6 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 7★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon RF | Sony E |
| Format | full-frame★ | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.07 kg★ | 0.11 kg |
| Filter Thread | 62 mm | 41 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | manual focus only | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 4 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 1.60 m | 250 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.215x★ |
Avantages & Inconvénients
Vivitar V420-800-EOS-R 420-1600mm
- Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong versatility (70th percentile)
- Strong social proof (68th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (7th percentile)7th %ile
- Below average af (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average bokeh (32nd percentile)
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 16-50mm
- Strong build (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong aperture (80th percentile)80th %ile
Prix
Vivitar V420-800-EOS-R 420-1600mm0.818score par dollar
vs
Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 16-50mm0.303score par dollar
Vivitar V420-800-EOS-R 420-1600mm offre un rapport qualité-prix 2.7x meilleur
Verdict
Gagnant: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS 16-50mm
Scores 90 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.
