Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B0
Sigma
66 Score global
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm
Panasonic
89 Score global
Scores
Macro
Budget
Landscape
Travel
Video Cinema
Portrait
Street
Professional
Wildlife Sports
Spécifications
| Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B0 | Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 135 mm | 28 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 135 mm | 200 mm |
| Elements | 13 | 17 |
| Groups | 10 | 13 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 1★ |
| ED Elements | 4 | 4 |
| Coating | wasserabweisende Beschichtung, antistatisches Glas | Fluorine coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/1.4 | f/4 |
| Min Aperture | f/1.8 | 4-7.1 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | L-Mount |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.09 kg★ | 0.41 kg |
| Filter Thread | 105 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Hyper Sonic AF Motor | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 6.5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 875 mm | 140 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.5x★ |
Avantages & Inconvénients
Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B0
- Strong bokeh (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong aperture (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong optical (79th percentile)
- Below average social proof (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm
- Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong build (78th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (23rd percentile)
Prix
Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B00.292score par dollar
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm0.111score par dollar
Sigma WR-UV-Filter AFK9B0 offre un rapport qualité-prix 2.6x meilleur
Verdict
Gagnant: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm
Scores 89 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 22 specs.
