TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO
85 Score global
vs
JBL JBLT110BLKAME

JBL JBLT110BLKAME

JBL
40 Score global

Scores

Budget
TOZO
79
JBL
50
Gaming
TOZO
79
JBL
37
Travel
TOZO
78
JBL
30
Fitness
TOZO
72
JBL
31
Calls
TOZO
70
JBL
27
Commute
TOZO
70
JBL
29
Music
TOZO
68
JBL
43

Spécifications

TOZO Crystal PodsJBL JBLT110BLKAME
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wireless
Ear TipsMedium3 x Ear Tip Sizes
Weight0.04 kg0.01 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size10 mm9 mm
Drivers9
Freq Min20 Hz20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz20 kHz
Impedance32 Ω16 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB96 dB
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsLDAC
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typehybrid
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.4
Multipoint
Range10 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life7 hrs
Charge Time2 hrs
Fast Charging10-minute charge gives 2+ hours of play
ChargingUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery35 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count4
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantOther
Touch Controls
AppTOZO App
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIPX5

Avantages & Inconvénients

TOZO Crystal Pods

  • Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong anc (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong build (92nd percentile)92nd %ile

JBL JBLT110BLKAME

  • Strong comfort (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong sound (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Below average connectivity (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average social proof (24th percentile)
  • Below average anc (32nd percentile)
  • Below average build (35th percentile)

Prix

JBL JBLT110BLKAME is 4 $US cheaper (1.3x less).

TOZO Crystal Pods5.245score par dollar
vs
JBL JBLT110BLKAME3.364score par dollar

TOZO Crystal Pods offre un rapport qualité-prix 1.6x meilleur

Verdict

Gagnant: TOZO Crystal Pods

Scores 85 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 19 of 36 specs.

TOZO Crystal Pods Meilleur pour:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

A considérer aussi