TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO
84 Score global
vs
Fhumsh A10

Fhumsh A10

Fhumsh
61 Score global

Scores

Gaming
TOZO
80
Fhumsh
66
Budget
TOZO
80
Fhumsh
58
Travel
TOZO
78
Fhumsh
61
Fitness
TOZO
72
Fhumsh
38
Calls
TOZO
70
Fhumsh
55
Commute
TOZO
70
Fhumsh
56
Music
TOZO
68
Fhumsh
53

Spécifications

TOZO Crystal PodsFhumsh A10
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styletrue wirelesstrue wireless
Ear TipsMediumS, M, L
Weight0.04 kg0.20 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size10 mm13 mm
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz
Impedance32 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsLDACWireless Earbuds, Bluetooth 5.3 Headphones DK-White
Noise Control
ANC
ANC TypehybridEnvironmental Noise Cancellation
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.45.3
Multipoint
Range10 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life7 hrs8 hrs
Charge Time2 hrs1.5 hrs
Fast Charging10-minute charge gives 2+ hours of play1.5 hours to fully charge
ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery35 hrs50 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count4
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantOther
Touch Controls
AppTOZO App
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIPX5IPX7

Avantages & Inconvénients

TOZO Crystal Pods

  • Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong anc (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong build (92nd percentile)92nd %ile

Fhumsh A10

  • Strong battery (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong anc (83rd percentile)83rd %ile

Prix

Both products are similarly priced.

TOZO Crystal Pods5.239score par dollar
vs
Fhumsh A103.602score par dollar

TOZO Crystal Pods offre un rapport qualité-prix 1.5x meilleur

Verdict

Gagnant: TOZO Crystal Pods

Scores 84 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 10 of 35 specs.

TOZO Crystal Pods Meilleur pour:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

A considérer aussi