JLab JBuds Pro EPROTPCRBLK123
JLab
43 Score global
vs
TOZO Crystal Pods
TOZO
84 Score global
Scores
Gaming
Budget
Travel
Fitness
Calls
Commute
Music
Spécifications
| JLab JBuds Pro EPROTPCRBLK123 | TOZO Crystal Pods | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | — | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | Small, Medium, Large | Medium |
| Weight | 0.03 kg★ | 0.04 kg |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 10 mm | 10 mm |
| Freq Min | — | 20 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | — | 20 kHz★ |
| Impedance | — | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 100 dB★ |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓ | ✓ |
| Codecs | — | LDAC |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✗ | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | hybrid |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.4★ |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Range | — | 10 m★ |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 7 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 2 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 10-minute charge gives 2+ hours of play |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | — | 35 hrs★ |
| Case Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Wireless Charging | — | ✓★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | — | 4★ |
| NC Mic | — | ✓★ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Other |
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| App | — | TOZO App |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✓★ |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | — | IPX5 |
Avantages & Inconvénients
JLab JBuds Pro EPROTPCRBLK123
- Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Strong sound (75th percentile)
- Strong comfort (73rd percentile)
- Below average connectivity (30th percentile)
- Below average anc (32nd percentile)
TOZO Crystal Pods
- Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong anc (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong build (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
Prix
JLab JBuds Pro EPROTPCRBLK1231.440score par dollar
vs
TOZO Crystal Pods5.239score par dollar
TOZO Crystal Pods offre un rapport qualité-prix 3.6x meilleur
Verdict
Gagnant: TOZO Crystal Pods
Scores 84 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 16 of 35 specs.
