CCA AZ09

CCA AZ09

CCA
43 Score global
vs
JLab Jbuds Pods ANC

JLab Jbuds Pods ANC

JLab
86 Score global

Scores

Gaming
CCA
44
JLab
84
Calls
CCA
29
JLab
83
Travel
CCA
33
JLab
82
Commute
CCA
28
JLab
81
Budget
CCA
46
JLab
78
Fitness
CCA
44
JLab
76
Music
CCA
38
JLab
69

Spécifications

CCA AZ09JLab Jbuds Pods ANC
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styleear-hookstem
Ear TipsS, M, L
Weight0.06 kg0.12 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamic
Driver Size11 mm
Drivers1
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsAACSBC, AAC
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typehybrid
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.45.4
Multipoint
Earbud Battery
Battery Life6 hrs10 hrs
Charge Time0.16699999570846558 hrs
Fast Charging10 min for 2 hours playback
ChargingUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery30 hrs56 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count6
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantGoogle Assistant
Touch Controls
AppJlab App
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceWaterproofIP55

Avantages & Inconvénients

CCA AZ09

  • Strong connectivity (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong build (74th percentile)
  • Strong comfort (73rd percentile)
  • Strong sound (72nd percentile)
  • Below average battery (22nd percentile)
  • Below average anc (32nd percentile)

JLab Jbuds Pods ANC

  • Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong battery (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong anc (94th percentile)94th %ile

Prix

CCA AZ09 is 20 $US cheaper (1.7x less).

CCA AZ091.417score par dollar
vs
JLab Jbuds Pods ANC1.716score par dollar

JLab Jbuds Pods ANC offre un rapport qualité-prix 1.2x meilleur

Verdict

Gagnant: JLab Jbuds Pods ANC

Scores 86 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 15 of 33 specs.

JLab Jbuds Pods ANC Meilleur pour:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

A considérer aussi