Fujifilm X-S X-S20 Black 2024
Fujifilm
97 Score global
vs
Polaroid 9097
Polaroid
20 Score global
Scores
Product Photography
Travel
Beginner
Photography
Video
Wedding Events
Vlogging
Youtube
Streaming
Sports Wildlife
Spécifications
| Fujifilm X-S X-S20 | Polaroid 9097 | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | X-Trans CMOS 4 | — |
| Size | aps-c | — |
| Megapixels | 26.100000381469727 MP★ | — |
| ISO Range | 160★ | — |
| Processor | X-Processor 5 | — |
| Autofocus | ||
| AF Points | Pas de données | |
| AF Type | Contrast Detection, Phase Detection: 117 | — |
| Eye AF | ✓★ | — |
| Animal AF | ✓★ | — |
| Subject Detection | ✓★ | — |
| Shooting | ||
| Burst (Mechanical) | 20 fps★ | — |
| Burst (Electronic) | 20 fps★ | — |
| Max Shutter | 1/32000 | — |
| Electronic Shutter | ✓★ | — |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | 6K★ | — |
| 4K FPS | 60 fps★ | — |
| 1080p FPS | 240 fps★ | — |
| 10-bit | ✓★ | — |
| Log Profile | ✓★ | — |
| RAW Video | ✓★ | — |
| Codec | H.264 ALL-Intra/H.264 Long GOP/H.265/H.265 Long GOP/MOV/MP4/MPEG-4 AVC 4:2:2/4:2:0 8/10-Bit | — |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | 3"★ | — |
| Touchscreen | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Articulating | ✓★ | — |
| EVF Resolution | 2.4M dots★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.49 kg | 0.32 kg★ |
| Battery Life | 750 shots★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | ✓★ | — |
| Bluetooth | ✓★ | — |
| USB | USB-C | USB-C |
| HDMI | Micro-HDMI | — |
| Hot Shoe | ✓★ | ✗ |
Avantages & Inconvénients
Fujifilm X-S X-S20 Black 2024
- Strong display (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong battery (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong sensor (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong stabilization (96th percentile)96th %ile
Polaroid 9097
- Below average build (11th percentile)11th %ile
- Below average video (24th percentile)
- Below average sensor (30th percentile)
- Below average display (31st percentile)
Prix
Fujifilm X-S X-S20 Black 20240.074score par dollar
vs
Polaroid 90970.265score par dollar
Polaroid 9097 offre un rapport qualité-prix 3.6x meilleur
Verdict
Gagnant: Fujifilm X-S X-S20
Scores 97 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 24 of 33 specs.
