Profoto 100992
Profoto
16 Score global
vs
SJCAM C400
SJCAM
52 Score global
Scores
Youtube
Video
Beginner
Vlogging
Streaming
Wedding Events
Travel
Product Photography
Sports Wildlife
Photography
Spécifications
| Profoto 100992 | SJCAM C400 | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | — | CMOS |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | — | 4K★ |
| Log Profile | — | ✓★ |
| Codec | — | MP4 |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | — | 2.3"★ |
| Touchscreen | — | ✓★ |
| Articulating | — | ✓★ |
| Build | ||
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.25 kg★ | 0.78 kg |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | ✗ |
Avantages & Inconvénients
Profoto 100992
- Below average build (7th percentile)7th %ile
- Below average social proof (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average connectivity (22nd percentile)
- Below average video (24th percentile)
SJCAM C400
- Strong build (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong display (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong stabilization (79th percentile)
- Strong social proof (77th percentile)
- Below average sensor (29th percentile)
- Below average burst (34th percentile)
Prix
Profoto 1009920.263score par dollar
vs
SJCAM C4000.304score par dollar
SJCAM C400 offre un rapport qualité-prix 1.2x meilleur
Verdict
Gagnant: SJCAM C400
Scores 52 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 7 of 11 specs.
