Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 200-27mm

Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 200-27mm

Fujifilm
80 Puntuación general
vs
Sony E SEL16F28S 16mm

Sony E SEL16F28S 16mm

Sony
48 Puntuación general

Puntuaciones

Professional
Fujifilm
81
Sony
49
Macro
Fujifilm
79
Sony
27
Video Cinema
Fujifilm
76
Sony
52
Street
Fujifilm
72
Sony
62
Wildlife Sports
Fujifilm
71
Sony
42
Budget
Fujifilm
70
Sony
47
Landscape
Fujifilm
64
Sony
28
Portrait
Fujifilm
63
Sony
64
Travel
Fujifilm
60
Sony
40

Especificaciones

Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 200-27mmSony E SEL16F28S 16mm
Optics
Typeprimewide-angle
Focal Length Min18 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max18 mm16 mm
Elements155
Groups95
Aspherical Elements31
ED Elements1
CoatingSuper EBC coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/2.8
Min Aperturef/1.4f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades97
Build
MountFujifilm XSony E
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.37 kg0.07 kg
Filter Thread62 mm49 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeLinear motorAuto Focus
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance200 mm240 mm
Max Magnification1:6.670.078x

Pros y Contras

Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 200-27mm

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong social proof (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong macro (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Sony E SEL16F28S 16mm

  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong aperture (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Below average optical (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average macro (30th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Precios

Sony E SEL16F28S 16mm is 791 US$ cheaper (4.1x less).

Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 200-27mm0.076puntos por dólar
vs
Sony E SEL16F28S 16mm0.187puntos por dólar

Sony E SEL16F28S 16mm ofrece 2.5x mejor relación calidad-precio

Veredicto

Ganador: Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 200-27mm

Scores 80 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR 200-27mm Mejor en:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

También considerar