Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony
89 Puntuación general
vs
Zeiss Milvus 000000-1365-659 35mm

Zeiss Milvus 000000-1365-659 35mm

Zeiss
41 Puntuación general

Puntuaciones

Travel
Sony
94
Zeiss
27
Budget
Sony
91
Zeiss
27
Street
Sony
90
Zeiss
26
Video Cinema
Sony
85
Zeiss
27
Wildlife Sports
Sony
84
Zeiss
23
Landscape
Sony
79
Zeiss
32
Portrait
Sony
77
Zeiss
26
Professional
Sony
77
Zeiss
34
Macro
Sony
68
Zeiss
47

Especificaciones

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSSZeiss Milvus 000000-1365-659 35mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min16 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max50 mm35 mm
Elements99
Groups87
Aspherical Elements4★—
ED Elements11
Coating—T*
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/22
Min Aperture3.5-5.6f/2
Constant✗✓★
Diaphragm Blades710★
Build
MountSony ENikon F
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.11 kg★0.65 kg
Filter Thread41 mm58 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusmanual focus only
Stabilization✓★✗
Stabilization Stops4 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm★300 mm
Max Magnification0.215x1:5.26★

Pros y Contras

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile

Zeiss Milvus 000000-1365-659 35mm

  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong macro (71st percentile)
  • Below average social proof (11th percentile)11th %ile
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average aperture (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (30th percentile)

Precios

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS is 332 US$ cheaper (2.0x less).

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS0.255puntos por dólar
vs
Zeiss Milvus 000000-1365-659 35mm0.060puntos por dólar

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS ofrece 4.3x mejor relación calidad-precio

Veredicto

★ Ganador: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Scores 89 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Mejor en:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

También considerar