Rulefiss Q38 vs Technics EAH-AZ100
Rulefiss Q38
Rulefiss
60 Puntuación general
vs
Technics EAH-AZ100
Technics
100 Puntuación general
Lo que dicen los compradores
Rulefiss Q38
Sin opiniones de clientes aún
Technics EAH-AZ100
88 de 100 confianza media 28 reseñas
Los auriculares Technics EAH-AZ100 son ampliamente elogiados por su excepcional calidad de sonido, con graves profundos, agudos nítidos y audio inmersivo. La comodidad, la duración de la batería y la cancelación de ruido también son frecuentemente destacadas, aunque algunos usuarios señalan el alto precio y el volumen limitado. Se mencionaron problemas menores como desconexiones de Bluetooth LE y emparejamiento inicial con múltiples dispositivos, pero el sentimiento general es muy positivo.
Ventajas
- Calidad de sonido excepcional
- Graves profundos e inmersivos
- Cancelación de ruido efectiva
- Ajuste cómodo
- Excelente duración de batería
Desventajas
- Precio alto
- Volumen máximo limitado
- Desconexiones Bluetooth LE
- Problemas de emparejamiento multi-dispositivo
- Exterior de plástico
Sound quality 12
Bass performance 6
Noise cancellation 5
Comfort 6
Battery life 5
Value for money 4
Puntuaciones
Calls
Travel
Music
Commute
Gaming
Fitness
Budget
Especificaciones
| Rulefiss Q38 | Technics EAH-AZ100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | ear-hook | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | S, M, L | 5 x Eartip Pairs |
| Weight | 0.07 kg | 0.01 kg★ |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 14.199999809265137 mm★ | 10 mm |
| Drivers | 1 | 1 |
| Freq Min | 18 Hz★ | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 25 kHz | 40 kHz★ |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 16 Ω |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | AAC, SBC | AAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC |
| Surround | — | Dolby Atmos, Spatial Audio |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | — | adaptive |
| Transparency | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.4★ | 5.3 |
| Profiles | HSP, HFP, A2DP, AVRCP | AVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP |
| Multipoint | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | — | Bluetooth |
| Range | — | 10 m★ |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 8 hrs | 8 hrs |
| Charge Time | 1.5 hrs★ | 2.5 hrs |
| Fast Charging | 10 min for 2 hours playback | 15 min. for 90 min. playback |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 56 hrs★ | 28 hrs |
| Case Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Wireless Charging | — | ✓★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 4 | 6★ |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Siri, Google Assistant | Google Assistant, Siri |
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| App | — | Android & iOS |
| Volume Limiting | — | ✗ |
| Gaming Mode | ✗ | ✗ |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | IPX7 | IPX4 |
Pros y Contras
Rulefiss Q38
- Strong battery (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong mic (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong sound (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Technics EAH-AZ100
- Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong sound (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Below average affordability (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
Precios
Rulefiss Q382.505puntos por dólar
vs
Technics EAH-AZ1000.426puntos por dólar
Rulefiss Q38 ofrece 5.9x mejor relación calidad-precio
Veredicto
Ganador: Technics EAH-AZ100
Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 8 of 39 specs.
