Baseus Inspire XC1 vs Technics EAH-AZ100
Baseus Inspire XC1
Baseus
55 Puntuación general
vs
Technics EAH-AZ100
Technics
100 Puntuación general
Lo que dicen los compradores
Baseus Inspire XC1
Sin opiniones de clientes aún
Technics EAH-AZ100
88 de 100 confianza media 28 reseñas
Los auriculares Technics EAH-AZ100 son ampliamente elogiados por su excepcional calidad de sonido, con graves profundos, agudos nítidos y audio inmersivo. La comodidad, la duración de la batería y la cancelación de ruido también son frecuentemente destacadas, aunque algunos usuarios señalan el alto precio y el volumen limitado. Se mencionaron problemas menores como desconexiones de Bluetooth LE y emparejamiento inicial con múltiples dispositivos, pero el sentimiento general es muy positivo.
Ventajas
- Calidad de sonido excepcional
- Graves profundos e inmersivos
- Cancelación de ruido efectiva
- Ajuste cómodo
- Excelente duración de batería
Desventajas
- Precio alto
- Volumen máximo limitado
- Desconexiones Bluetooth LE
- Problemas de emparejamiento multi-dispositivo
- Exterior de plástico
Sound quality 12
Bass performance 6
Noise cancellation 5
Comfort 6
Battery life 5
Value for money 4
Puntuaciones
Calls
Travel
Music
Commute
Gaming
Fitness
Budget
Especificaciones
| Baseus Inspire XC1 | Technics EAH-AZ100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | open-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | clip-on | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | — | 5 x Eartip Pairs |
| Weight | — | 0.01 kg★ |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | hybrid | dynamic |
| Driver Size | — | 10 mm★ |
| Drivers | 2★ | 1 |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 40 kHz | 40 kHz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 102 dB★ | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓ | ✓ |
| Codecs | LDAC | AAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC |
| Surround | — | Dolby Atmos, Spatial Audio |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✗ | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | adaptive |
| Transparency | ✓ | ✓ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | 5.3★ |
| Profiles | — | AVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP |
| Multipoint | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wired Connector | — | Bluetooth |
| Range | — | 10 m★ |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 40 hrs★ | 8 hrs |
| Charge Time | 1.5 hrs★ | 2.5 hrs |
| Fast Charging | 10 min for 2.5 hours | 15 min. for 90 min. playback |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 40 hrs★ | 28 hrs |
| Case Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Wireless Charging | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 4 | 6★ |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Google Assistant, Siri |
| Touch Controls | ✗ | ✓★ |
| App | Baseus App | Android & iOS |
| Volume Limiting | — | ✗ |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✗ |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | IP66 | IPX4 |
Pros y Contras
Baseus Inspire XC1
- Strong battery (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong sound (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong mic (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong connectivity (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Below average affordability (17th percentile)17th %ile
- Below average comfort (27th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Technics EAH-AZ100
- Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong sound (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Below average affordability (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
Precios
Baseus Inspire XC10.504puntos por dólar
vs
Technics EAH-AZ1000.426puntos por dólar
Baseus Inspire XC1 ofrece 1.2x mejor relación calidad-precio
Veredicto
Ganador: Technics EAH-AZ100
Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 8 of 40 specs.
