Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 32-core Socket A/Socket 462 (PGA 462)

Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 32-core Socket A/Socket 462 (PGA 462)

Dell
51 Puntuación general
vs
PC Server and Parts E5-2697 v2-cr

PC Server and Parts E5-2697 v2-cr

PC Server and Parts
40 Puntuación general

Puntuaciones

Ai Llm
Dell
63
PC Server and Parts
35
Budget
Dell
44
PC Server and Parts
61
Productivity
Dell
58
PC Server and Parts
47
Server
Dell
51
PC Server and Parts
34
Efficiency
Dell
19
PC Server and Parts
35
Gaming
Dell
32
PC Server and Parts
34

Especificaciones

Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2PC Server and Parts E5-2697 v2-cr
Processor
BrandIntel—
SeriesXeon—
Model5-2637 V2—
CodenameTurin—
Classserver—
Process4★—
Cores & Clocks
Cores32★—
P-cores48★—
Threads64★—
Base Clock
2,000
Sin datos
Boost Clock
3,500
Sin datos
Cache
L2 Cache48★—
L3 Cache
256
Sin datos
Performance
PassMark Multi
6,486
14,251
PassMark Single
1,937
1,781
Memory
Memory TypeDDR4★—
Max Speed
6,000
Sin datos
Max Memory
2,048
Sin datos
ECC✓★—
Platform & Power
SocketSocket A/Socket 462 (PGA 462)—
PCIe3.0—
PCIe Lanes64★—
TDP200★—
Max Turbo Power350★—
Unlocked✗—
Graphics & AI
Integrated GraphicsNo—

Pros y Contras

Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 32-core Socket A/Socket 462 (PGA 462)

  • Strong ai (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong feature (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong affordability (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong platform (77th percentile)
  • Below average efficiency (32nd percentile)

PC Server and Parts E5-2697 v2-cr

  • Strong affordability (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong multi thread (68th percentile)
  • Below average platform (17th percentile)17th %ile
  • Below average feature (21st percentile)
  • Below average efficiency (29th percentile)

Precios

Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 32-core Socket A/Socket 462 (PGA 462)

PC Server and Parts E5-2697 v2-cr

No current pricing available

Veredicto

★ Ganador: Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2

Scores 51 overall, wins 3 of 6 usage categories and 16 of 26 specs.

Dell Xeon E5-2637 V2 Mejor en:

Ai LlmServerProductivity

PC Server and Parts E5-2697 v2-cr Mejor en:

BudgetEfficiency

También considerar