iBeam TE-FTGC

iBeam TE-FTGC

iBeam
18 Puntuación general
vs
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II Black 2015

Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II Black 2015

Olympus
58 Puntuación general

Puntuaciones

Sports Wildlife
iBeam
16
Olympus
65
Vlogging
iBeam
8
Olympus
64
Beginner
iBeam
17
Olympus
63
Travel
iBeam
11
Olympus
61
Streaming
iBeam
10
Olympus
61
Video
iBeam
15
Olympus
59
Wedding Events
iBeam
15
Olympus
59
Youtube
iBeam
12
Olympus
58
Photography
iBeam
20
Olympus
57
Product Photography
iBeam
19
Olympus
51

Especificaciones

iBeam TE-FTGCOlympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II
Sensor
TypeCMOSLive MOS
Sizemicro-four-thirds
Megapixels16.100000381469727 MP
ISO Range100
ProcessorTruePic VII
Autofocus
AF Points81
AF Type81
Shooting
Burst (Mechanical)10 fps
Max Shutter1/8000
Electronic Shutter
Video
Max Resolution1080p
1080p FPS60 fps
RAW Video
Codecvarious codecs
Display & EVF
Screen Size3"
Articulating
EVF Resolution2.4M dots
Build
Weather Sealed
Weight0.41 kg
Connectivity
Wi-Fi
Hot Shoe

Pros y Contras

iBeam TE-FTGC

  • Below average connectivity (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average video (23rd percentile)
  • Below average display (28th percentile)
  • Below average sensor (29th percentile)

Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II Black 2015

  • Strong build (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong evf (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong social proof (79th percentile)
  • Below average sensor (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile

Precios

iBeam TE-FTGC is 1371 US$ cheaper (11.7x less).

iBeam TE-FTGC0.143puntos por dólar
vs
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II Black 20150.039puntos por dólar

iBeam TE-FTGC ofrece 3.7x mejor relación calidad-precio

Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II Black 2015

Veredicto

Ganador: Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II

Scores 58 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 15 of 21 specs.

Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II Mejor en:

VideoTravelYoutubeBeginnerVloggingStreamingPhotographyWedding EventsSports WildlifeProduct Photography

También considerar