HamiltonBuhl Vivid Pro CAM17SV Red 2020
HamiltonBuhl
20 Puntuación general
vs
Leica Q2 Monochrom Q2 Monochrom Black 2019
Leica
74 Puntuación general
Puntuaciones
Sports Wildlife
Wedding Events
Beginner
Photography
Product Photography
Video
Travel
Streaming
Youtube
Vlogging
Especificaciones
| HamiltonBuhl Vivid Pro CAM17SV | Leica Q2 Monochrom Q2 Monochrom | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | — | CMOS |
| Size | — | full-frame |
| Megapixels | 18 MP | 47.29999923706055 MP★ |
| ISO Range | — | 100★ |
| Processor | — | Maestro II |
| Autofocus | ||
| Eye AF | — | ✓★ |
| Subject Detection | — | ✓★ |
| Shooting | ||
| Burst (Mechanical) | — | 10 fps★ |
| Max Shutter | — | 1/40000 |
| Electronic Shutter | — | ✓★ |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | 1080p | 4K★ |
| 4K FPS | — | 30 fps★ |
| 1080p FPS | — | 60 fps★ |
| 10-bit | — | ✓★ |
| Log Profile | — | ✓★ |
| Codec | AVI | H.264/MP4 |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | 2.7" | 3"★ |
| Touchscreen | — | ✓★ |
| Articulating | — | ✗ |
| EVF Resolution | — | 1.0M dots★ |
| Build | ||
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.27 kg★ | 0.73 kg |
| Battery Life | — | 400 shots★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | ✓★ |
| USB | — | USB-C★ |
| HDMI | — | Micro HDMI★ |
| Hot Shoe | — | ✓★ |
Pros y Contras
HamiltonBuhl Vivid Pro CAM17SV Red 2020
- Strong stabilization (78th percentile)
- Below average build (8th percentile)8th %ile
- Below average sensor (12th percentile)12th %ile
- Below average connectivity (21st percentile)
- Below average video (24th percentile)
Leica Q2 Monochrom Q2 Monochrom Black 2019
- Strong user sentiment (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong build (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong battery (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong connectivity (90th percentile)90th %ile
Precios
HamiltonBuhl Vivid Pro CAM17SV Red 20200.145puntos por dólar
vs
Leica Q2 Monochrom Q2 Monochrom Black 20190.188puntos por dólar
Leica Q2 Monochrom Q2 Monochrom Black 2019 ofrece 1.3x mejor relación calidad-precio
Veredicto
Ganador: Leica Q2 Monochrom Q2 Monochrom
Scores 74 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 21 of 28 specs.
