Samsung Neo QLED QN100QN80FFXZA 100"
Samsung
94 Overall Score
vs
Supersonic SC-3222 32"
Supersonic
17 Overall Score
What Buyers Say
Samsung Neo QLED QN100QN80FFXZA 100"
88 out of 100 low confidence 8 reviews
Overall, users are highly satisfied with this Samsung Neo QLED TV, praising its exceptional picture quality, brightness, and contrast. The AI features and easy setup are also highlighted as major positives. Some minor issues were noted, such as difficulty connecting external devices and a desire for louder volume, but these do not overshadow the overall positive sentiment.
Pros
- Exceptional picture quality
- Brightness and contrast
- AI features
- Easy setup
- Smooth motion handling
Cons
- Finicky external device connection
- Volume could be louder
- Heavy, needs two people to move
Picture quality 7
Brightness contrast 4
Ai features 2
Ease of setup 3
Sound quality 3
Connectivity 1
Supersonic SC-3222 32"
No customer feedback yet
Scores
Sports
Streaming
Budget
Smart Home
Corporate
Gaming
Movies
Outdoor
Portable
Specifications
| Samsung Neo QLED QN100QN80FFXZA 100" | Supersonic SC-3222 32" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 100" | 32" |
| Resolution | 4K★ | HD |
| Panel Type | Mini-LED★ | LED |
| Backlight | Mini-LED★ | Direct LED |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✗ |
| Picture Quality | ||
| Brightness | 1000 nits★ | 200 nits |
| Contrast Ratio | infinite | 1000:1 (dynamic) |
| Color Gamut | Not Specified by Manufacturer | — |
| Color Depth | 10-bit★ | — |
| Motion Tech | Motion Xcelerator 144Hz | — |
| Processor | NQ4 AI Gen2 Processor | — |
| HDR | ||
| HDR Formats | HDR10, HDR10+, HLG | — |
| Dolby Vision | ✗ | — |
| HDR10+ | ✓★ | — |
| HLG | ✓★ | — |
| Gaming | ||
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz★ | — |
| Response Time | — | 8 ms★ |
| VRR | FreeSync Premium Pro, Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) | — |
| ALLM | ✓★ | — |
| Game Mode | ✓★ | — |
| Smart TV | ||
| Platform | Tizen | — |
| Voice Assistant | Alexa | — |
| Screen Mirroring | SmartThings | — |
| Works With | Alexa | — |
| Audio | ||
| Speaker Config | 4.0 | 2.0 |
| Wattage | 30W★ | 16W |
| Dolby Atmos | ✓★ | — |
| Surround Sound | Dolby Atmos | — |
| eARC | ✓★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 4★ | 3 |
| HDMI Version | 2.1★ | — |
| USB Ports | 2★ | 1 |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.3★ | — |
| Ethernet | ✓★ | — |
| Optical Audio | ✓★ | — |
| VESA Mount | 600x400 | — |
| Power & Size | ||
| Power | 175W | 60W★ |
| Energy Star | ✗ | — |
| Annual Energy | 662 kWh★ | — |
| Weight | 60.28 kg | 4.49 kg★ |
Pros & Cons
Samsung Neo QLED QN100QN80FFXZA 100"
- Strong display (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong hdr (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong picture quality (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong connectivity (89th percentile)89th %ile
Supersonic SC-3222 32"
- Below average picture quality (1st percentile)1st %ile
- Below average display (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average smart (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average hdr (13th percentile)13th %ile
Pricing
Samsung Neo QLED QN100QN80FFXZA 100"0.025score per dollar
vs
Supersonic SC-3222 32"0.071score per dollar
Supersonic SC-3222 32" offers 2.8x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Samsung Neo QLED QN100QN80FFXZA 100"
Scores 94 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 20 of 42 specs.
