Roku Plus Series 65R6C7KIT1 65"
Roku
37 Overall Score
vs
Samsung Neo QLED QN100QN80FFXZA 100"
Samsung
94 Overall Score
What Buyers Say
Roku Plus Series 65R6C7KIT1 65"
No customer feedback yet
Samsung Neo QLED QN100QN80FFXZA 100"
88 out of 100 low confidence 8 reviews
Overall, users are highly satisfied with this Samsung Neo QLED TV, praising its exceptional picture quality, brightness, and contrast. The AI features and easy setup are also highlighted as major positives. Some minor issues were noted, such as difficulty connecting external devices and a desire for louder volume, but these do not overshadow the overall positive sentiment.
Pros
- Exceptional picture quality
- Brightness and contrast
- AI features
- Easy setup
- Smooth motion handling
Cons
- Finicky external device connection
- Volume could be louder
- Heavy, needs two people to move
Picture quality 7
Brightness contrast 4
Ai features 2
Ease of setup 3
Sound quality 3
Connectivity 1
Scores
Sports
Streaming
Budget
Smart Home
Corporate
Gaming
Movies
Outdoor
Portable
Specifications
| Roku Plus Series 65R6C7KIT1 65" | Samsung Neo QLED QN100QN80FFXZA 100" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 65" | 100" |
| Resolution | 4K | 4K |
| Panel Type | QLED | Mini-LED★ |
| Backlight | Mini-LED | Mini-LED |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | — | ✗ |
| Picture Quality | ||
| Brightness | — | 1000 nits★ |
| Contrast Ratio | — | infinite |
| Color Gamut | — | Not Specified by Manufacturer |
| Color Depth | — | 10-bit★ |
| Motion Tech | — | Motion Xcelerator 144Hz |
| Processor | — | NQ4 AI Gen2 Processor |
| HDR | ||
| HDR Formats | Dolby Vision, HDR10+ | HDR10, HDR10+, HLG |
| Dolby Vision | ✓★ | ✗ |
| HDR10+ | ✓ | ✓ |
| HLG | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Gaming | ||
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| VRR | — | FreeSync Premium Pro, Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) |
| ALLM | — | ✓★ |
| Game Mode | — | ✓★ |
| Smart TV | ||
| Platform | Roku TV | Tizen |
| Voice Assistant | Roku Voice Remote | Alexa |
| Screen Mirroring | — | SmartThings |
| Works With | — | Alexa |
| Audio | ||
| Speaker Config | — | 4.0 |
| Wattage | — | 30W★ |
| Dolby Atmos | — | ✓★ |
| Surround Sound | — | Dolby Atmos |
| eARC | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | — | 4★ |
| HDMI Version | — | 2.1★ |
| USB Ports | — | 2★ |
| Wi-Fi | WiFi | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3★ |
| Ethernet | — | ✓★ |
| Optical Audio | — | ✓★ |
| VESA Mount | — | 600x400 |
| Power & Size | ||
| Power | — | 175W★ |
| Energy Star | — | ✗ |
| Annual Energy | — | 662 kWh★ |
| Weight | — | 60.28 kg★ |
Pros & Cons
Roku Plus Series 65R6C7KIT1 65"
- Strong hdr (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong picture quality (78th percentile)
- Below average audio (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average connectivity (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average smart (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average social proof (33rd percentile)
Samsung Neo QLED QN100QN80FFXZA 100"
- Strong display (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong hdr (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong picture quality (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong connectivity (89th percentile)89th %ile
Pricing
Roku Plus Series 65R6C7KIT1 65"0.056score per dollar
vs
Samsung Neo QLED QN100QN80FFXZA 100"0.025score per dollar
Roku Plus Series 65R6C7KIT1 65" offers 2.2x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Samsung Neo QLED QN100QN80FFXZA 100"
Scores 94 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 18 of 41 specs.
