Supersonic SC-2816
Supersonic
27 Overall Score
vs
Samsung Neo QLED QN990F 75"
Samsung
98 Overall Score
What Buyers Say
Supersonic SC-2816
No customer feedback yet
Samsung Neo QLED QN990F 75"
88 out of 100 medium confidence 16 reviews
Overall, users are highly satisfied with this TV, praising its exceptional brightness, vivid colors, and sharp picture quality. Many highlight the immersive experience for gaming and movies, with several noting the impressive soundstage and responsive UI. A few minor criticisms include the lack of 8K content and a desire for more remote control options, but these do not detract from the overwhelmingly positive sentiment.
Pros
- Exceptional brightness
- Vivid colors
- Sharp picture quality
- Immersive soundstage
- Responsive UI
Cons
- Lack of 8K content
- Remote control limited options
- UI could be improved
Brightness 8
Color quality 7
Picture quality 6
Sound quality 5
Gaming experience 3
Ui responsiveness 3
Scores
Smart Home
Streaming
Budget
Sports
Corporate
Gaming
Movies
Outdoor
Portable
Specifications
| Supersonic SC-2816 | Samsung Neo QLED QN990F 75" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | — | 75" |
| Resolution | HD | 8K★ |
| Panel Type | LED | Mini-LED★ |
| Backlight | Direct LED | Mini-LED★ |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | — | ✗ |
| Screen Finish | — | matte |
| Picture Quality | ||
| Brightness | 500 nits★ | — |
| Peak Brightness | 500 nits★ | — |
| Contrast Ratio | 300:1 | infinite |
| Color Gamut | — | Not Specified by Manufacturer |
| Color Depth | — | 10-bit★ |
| Motion Tech | — | Motion Xcelerator 240 Hz |
| Processor | — | NQ8 AI Gen3 Processor |
| HDR | ||
| HDR Formats | — | HDR10, HDR10+, HLG |
| Dolby Vision | — | ✗ |
| HDR10+ | — | ✓★ |
| HLG | — | ✓★ |
| Gaming | ||
| Refresh Rate | — | 120 Hz★ |
| Response Time | 8 ms★ | — |
| VRR | — | FreeSync Premium Pro, VRR |
| ALLM | — | ✓★ |
| Game Mode | — | ✓★ |
| Smart TV | ||
| Platform | Fire TV | Tizen |
| Voice Assistant | — | Amazon Alexa, Bixby |
| Screen Mirroring | — | Apple AirPlay |
| Audio | ||
| Speaker Config | 2.1 | 6.2.4 |
| Wattage | — | 90W★ |
| Dolby Atmos | — | ✓★ |
| Surround Sound | — | Dolby Atmos |
| eARC | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | — | 5★ |
| HDMI Version | — | 2.1★ |
| USB Ports | — | 4★ |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 6E★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3★ |
| Ethernet | — | ✓★ |
| Optical Audio | — | ✓★ |
| VESA Mount | — | 400x300 |
| Power & Size | ||
| Power | — | 327W★ |
| Energy Star | — | ✗ |
| Annual Energy | — | 607 kWh★ |
| Weight | 1.86 kg★ | 30.80 kg |
Pros & Cons
Supersonic SC-2816
- Strong picture quality (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Below average connectivity (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average hdr (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average smart (17th percentile)17th %ile
- Below average display (23rd percentile)
Samsung Neo QLED QN990F 75"
- Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong audio (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong social proof (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong display (100th percentile)100th %ile
Pricing
Supersonic SC-28160.212score per dollar
vs
Samsung Neo QLED QN990F 75"0.036score per dollar
Supersonic SC-2816 offers 5.9x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Samsung Neo QLED QN990F 75"
Scores 98 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 21 of 43 specs.
