Higrace A7L

Higrace A7L

Higrace
25 Overall Score
vs
Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779 Blu 2025

Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779 Blu 2025

Xiaomi
79 Overall Score

Scores

Entertainment
Higrace
23
Xiaomi
82
Art Design
Higrace
17
Xiaomi
80
Reading
Higrace
22
Xiaomi
79
Productivity
Higrace
13
Xiaomi
71
Student
Higrace
18
Xiaomi
69
Business
Higrace
15
Xiaomi
62

Specifications

Higrace A7LXiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779
Processor
CPU3 GHz
Cores8
Memory & Storage
RAM12 GB
Storage512 GB
Expandable
Display
Size11.2"
Resolution3200 px
PanelLCD
Refresh Rate144 Hz
Brightness800 nits
Connectivity
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6E
BluetoothBluetooth 5.4
USB-C1
Cellular
Features
Stylus Support
Fingerprint Reader
Physical
Weight1.31 kg0.45 kg
OSHyperOS 2

Pros & Cons

Higrace A7L

  • Below average feature (8th percentile)8th %ile
  • Below average connectivity (10th percentile)10th %ile
  • Below average screen (29th percentile)
  • Below average storage (30th percentile)

Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779 Blu 2025

  • Strong screen (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong cpu (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong gpu (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong storage (89th percentile)89th %ile

Pricing

Higrace A7L is $465 cheaper (6.5x less).

Higrace A7L0.288score per dollar
vs
Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779 Blu 20250.143score per dollar

Higrace A7L offers 2.0x better value for money

Higrace A7L

Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779 Blu 2025

Verdict

Winner: Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779

Scores 79 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 12 of 18 specs.

Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779 Better at:

ReadingStudentBusinessArt DesignProductivityEntertainment

Also Consider