Microsoft Surface Pro 12" EP2-33676 Ocean 2025

Microsoft Surface Pro 12" EP2-33676 Ocean 2025

Microsoft
71 Overall Score
vs
Samsung SM-X230NZAAMXO

Samsung SM-X230NZAAMXO

Samsung
53 Overall Score

Scores

Student
Microsoft
76
Samsung
42
Productivity
Microsoft
76
Samsung
33
Reading
Microsoft
75
Samsung
51
Art Design
Microsoft
67
Samsung
37
Entertainment
Microsoft
67
Samsung
51
Business
Microsoft
65
Samsung
38

Specifications

Microsoft Surface Pro 12" EP2-33676Samsung SM-X230NZAAMXO
Processor
CPUQualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100
Cores88
GPUX1
GPU Benchmark Score59
Memory & Storage
RAM16 GB6 GB
RAM GenerationLPDDR5X
Storage512 GB128 GB
Storage TypeUFS
Expandable
Display
Size12"11"
Resolution2196 px
PanelLCDLCD
Refresh Rate90 Hz90 Hz
Brightness400 nits
Connectivity
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7
BluetoothBluetooth 5.4Bluetooth 5.1
USB-C21
Cellular
Features
Stylus Support
Stylus ModelSurface Slim Pen
Fingerprint Reader
Face Unlock
Physical
Weight0.68 kg0.68 kg
Battery38 Wh
OSWindows 11 HomeAndroid 16

Pros & Cons

Microsoft Surface Pro 12" EP2-33676 Ocean 2025

  • Strong cpu (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong battery (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong ram (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong storage (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Below average gpu (2nd percentile)2nd %ile

Samsung SM-X230NZAAMXO

  • Strong social proof (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong cpu (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Strong gpu (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (78th percentile)
  • Below average feature (18th percentile)18th %ile

Pricing

Samsung SM-X230NZAAMXO is $665 cheaper (3.8x less).

Microsoft Surface Pro 12" EP2-33676 Ocean 20250.079score per dollar
vs
Samsung SM-X230NZAAMXO0.226score per dollar

Samsung SM-X230NZAAMXO offers 2.9x better value for money

Microsoft Surface Pro 12" EP2-33676 Ocean 2025

Samsung SM-X230NZAAMXO

Verdict

Winner: Microsoft Surface Pro 12" EP2-33676

Scores 71 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 13 of 25 specs.

Microsoft Surface Pro 12" EP2-33676 Better at:

ReadingStudentBusinessArt DesignProductivityEntertainment

Also Consider