Lexar NS100 256GB SATA III 2.5"

Lexar NS100 256GB SATA III 2.5"

Lexar
36 Overall Score
vs
Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Seagate
91 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

Lexar NS100 256GB SATA III 2.5"

72 out of 100 low confidence 7 reviews

Most users are very satisfied with this 128GB SSD, praising its value for money, especially for upgrading older systems. One reviewer had a defective unit that failed diagnostics, but others found it a hidden gem. Overall, it's recommended for budget-conscious upgrades.

Pros
  • Great value for money
  • Fast for older systems
  • Easy upgrade for old PCs
  • Recommended by users
Cons
  • Defective unit risk
  • Failed diagnostics for one unit
👍 Value for money 3
👍 Performance 2
🤔 Reliability 2
👍 Ease of installation 1
👍 Recommendation 2

Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

85 out of 100 low confidence 5 reviews

This SSD is praised for its exceptional durability and high endurance, with a 5-year warranty and Rescue Services adding peace of mind. Users highlight its blazing-fast sequential read and write speeds, which are ideal for gaming and heavy workloads. The support for DirectStorage is a plus for modern gaming setups. However, some users note that compatibility with all computers may not be guaranteed, so checking system requirements is advised.

Pros
  • 5-year warranty
  • Rescue Services included
  • High endurance (5,050TBW)
  • Fast sequential read/write
  • DirectStorage support
Cons
  • Compatibility not guaranteed
  • May not fit all computers
👍 Durability 1
👍 Warranty 1
👍 Performance 1
👎 Compatibility 1
👍 Directstorage support 1

Scores

Laptop
Lexar
34
Seagate
91
Gaming
Lexar
23
Seagate
86
Console
Lexar
11
Seagate
84
Workstation
Lexar
40
Seagate
83
Budget
Lexar
70
Seagate
73
Portable
Lexar
8
Seagate
24

Specifications

Lexar NS100Seagate FireCuda 530R
Drive
Capacity
256
4,000
Form Factor2.5"M.2 2280
InterfaceSATA IIIPCIe 4.0 x4
ProtocolSATANVMe
PCIe Generation—4★
External✗✗
Performance
Sequential Read (MB/s)
550
7,400
Sequential Write (MB/s)No data
6,800
Random Read (IOPS)No data
1,300,000
Random Write (IOPS)No data
1,300,000
Hardware
NANDMLC★TLC
DRAM Cache—✗
Controller—E18
Reliability
Endurance (TBW)
128
5,050
MTBF (hours)No data
1,800,000
Warranty (years)35★
Features
Heatsink—✗

Pros & Cons

Lexar NS100 256GB SATA III 2.5"

  • Strong affordability (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Strong endurance (74th percentile)
  • Strong feature (72nd percentile)
  • Below average capacity (17th percentile)17th %ile
  • Below average speed (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average random (22nd percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (29th percentile)

Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

  • Strong random (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong endurance (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong speed (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong capacity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Below average affordability (7th percentile)7th %ile

Pricing

Lexar NS100 256GB SATA III 2.5" is $834 cheaper (14.9x less).

Lexar NS100 256GB SATA III 2.5"0.603score per dollar
vs
Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 22800.102score per dollar

Lexar NS100 256GB SATA III 2.5" offers 5.9x better value for money

Lexar NS100 256GB SATA III 2.5"

Seagate FireCuda 530R 4TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280

Verdict

★ Winner: Seagate FireCuda 530R

Scores 91 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 9 of 17 specs.

Seagate FireCuda 530R Better at:

BudgetGamingLaptopConsolePortableWorkstation

Also Consider